Answer in brief
App teams send traffic to a web page before the app store for four reasons: the page can explain more than a store listing, it is quick to change and test, many traffic sources can only link to a URL, and the page can capture interest before the install. The cost is one more step where people leave, and you need web-to-app attribution to see whether the page pays for itself.
What a web campaign for an app is
In an app install campaign, the ad opens the app store. In a web campaign for an app, the ad opens a web page that you control, and the page sends the visitor on to the store or straight into the app. The page might be a landing page, an article, a quiz or a creator's profile link. The goal is the same in both cases: a new user who does something of value in the app.
Four reasons teams add the web step
The page can say more
A store listing follows the store's layout. A landing page gives you more room to match the ad that led to it, answer one objection in depth, show a comparison, or speak to one audience.
The page is quick to change
You can publish a new headline on a web page in minutes and test two versions side by side with ordinary web tools. That makes the page a cheap place to learn which message works before you carry it into the app.
Many sources only accept a URL
Email, search results, creator bios, podcasts, partner sites and printed QR codes all point at a web address. If you already publish links in those places, you are running web campaigns whether you measure them or not.
The page can capture interest early
A visitor who is not ready to install may still leave an email address or answer a few questions. The app can then greet them with what they chose, if the link into the app carries that context. This is the job of a deferred deep link.
What the extra step costs
Every added step loses people. Some visitors read the page and never tap the store button, and some tap and never install. A web campaign only wins when the visitors who do continue are more likely to become valuable users than visitors sent straight to the store.
There is a measurement cost too. An install campaign reports installs inside the ad platform. A web campaign reports clicks or page events there, and the install happens out of the ad platform's sight. Unless the page hands the visit to your attribution platform, the installs it produces look as if they came from nowhere. The mechanism that prevents this is described in how web-to-app attribution works.
How to decide whether to try it
| Your situation | Web step likely to help? |
|---|---|
| The app needs explaining before someone will install | Yes |
| You already get traffic from email, search or creators | Yes, and you should be measuring it |
| You have several distinct audiences with different needs | Yes |
| The app is simple and the store listing already converts well | Probably no |
| Nobody on the team can keep a page up to date | No, a stale page costs more than it earns |
Running a fair test
- Choose one audience and one offer. Run an install campaign and a web campaign for it at the same time, with similar budgets.
- Give the web page's store button a tracking link, so that installs from the page are credited to the web campaign.
- Compare the two on the cost of one in-app event, such as a trial start or first purchase. Comparing clicks or installs alone favours whichever path is shorter.
- Let both run long enough for the in-app event to happen before you judge.
To compare the two on return, use the definition under ROAS.
What to do next
Start with the links you already publish. Pick the web source that sends the most visitors, put a tracking link on its path to the store, and read one week of results. The setup and the four counts to collect are in measuring a landing page that sends visitors to the app store.
Questions and answers
Is a web campaign cheaper than an app install campaign?
There is no general answer. It depends on your category, your page and your audience. Run both with a small budget and compare the cost of the in-app event you care about.
Can I run a web campaign without a website team?
Yes. One landing page with a store button that is a tracking link is enough to start. Keep the page simple until the numbers show it is worth more work.
Continue reading
Guide
How web-to-app attribution worksWeb-to-app attribution connects a web visit to the app install that follows. What the web page adds, where the match can fail, and what to check first.
Guide
Measuring a landing page that sends visitors to the app storeMeasure a landing page built to drive app installs: the four counts to collect, which tool holds each one, and how to read the drop between them.
Guide
UTM parameters versus tracking linksUTM parameters label a visit to a web page. Tracking links record a click and follow it into an app. When to use each, and how to use them together.
Guide
Recognising one person across the website and the appA website and an app identify people differently. Which identifiers join the two, what a shared user ID does, and what will stay unjoined.
Guide
What the web SDK does and what the app SDK doesAn attribution platform has an SDK for your app and another for your website. What each records, how they connect, and which one you need first.
Web and app
Best attribution platform when the journey starts on the webHow seven attribution platforms handle journeys that start on the web and end in an app, and which plan you need for it.
Cite this page
Airbridge. “Why teams run web campaigns to grow an app.” bestattributionplatform.com. Reviewed 2026-11-10. https://bestattributionplatform.com/web-campaigns-for-app-growth